A survey of self-management in dynamic software architecture specifications

By Jeremy S. Bradbury, James R. Cordy, J. Dingel, M. Wermelinger. Workshop on Self-Healing Systems, 2004

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Self-adaptive software: Landscape and research challenges (2009, methodology): “survey several ADLs based on graphs, process algebras, and other formalisms for dynamic software architectures [Bradbury et al. 2004].”
Model-based development of dynamically adaptive software (2006, background): “However, they share the following drawbacks: (1) Portions of the adaptation-speciﬁc speciﬁcations are entangled with the non-adaptive behavior speciﬁcations; (2) They do not support the speciﬁcation of state transfer, so that the target behavior must start from the initial state, thus making…”
Self-Managed Systems: an Architectural Challenge (2007, background): “• Builds on existing work – there is a wealth of architecture description languages and notations which include some support for dynamic architectures and for formal architecture-based analysis and reasoning [12].”
A survey on engineering approaches for self-adaptive systems (2015, background): “A comparison of ADLs can be found in [105].”