Cratering Records in the Inner Solar System in Relation to the Lunar Reference System
By Gerhard Neukum, B. Ivanov, W. Hartmann. 2001
813 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ad621dc4a461d2078becced8700a584e38ac6da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Mark A. Wieczorek
- Stuart J. Robbins
- S. Werner
- James W. Head III
- William Bottke
- Caleb I. Fassett
- B. Hynek
- D. Nesvorný
Citations in the corpus
- The rate of small impacts on Earth (2006, background): “Neukum et al. (2001), Werner et al. (2002), and Ivanov et al. (2003) have converted the lunar mare crater SFD to an impactor SFD and found a close match to the SFD of main belt asteroids and NEOs.”
- Nonuniform cratering of the Moon and a revised crater chronology of the inner Solar System (2011, methodology): “Our resulting best parameters are20 a′ = 1.893× 10−26 b′ = 14.44 c′ = 7.960× 10−4 , (25) and our proposed curve is shown in figure 8, along with the curves proposed by21 33 Neukum et al. (2001a) and Marchi et al. (2009).”
- China's Chang'e-5 landing site: Geology, stratigraphy, and provenance of materials (2021, background): “The cumulative number of craters ≥a reference diameter, usually 1 km or N(1), coupled with the radiometric and exposure ages of lunar samples are critical for the calibration of the lunar chronology function (Hiesinger et al., 2012; Iqbal et al., 2020, 2019; Neukum et al., 2001; van der Bogert and H”
- Large impact crater histories of Mars: The effect of different model crater age techniques (2013, methodology): “The first stand – picking a system, Hartmann (2005) or Neukum et al. (2001) – is not one that can be taken at this time.”
- Cratering Chronology and the Evolution of Mars (2001, methodology): “Neukum et al. (2001) laid out evidence that the shape of the crater size distribution and Space Science Reviews 96: 165-194, 2001.”
- A New Global Database of Lunar Impact Craters >1–2 km: 1. Crater Locations and Sizes, Comparisons With Published Databases, and Global Analysis (2019, result): “The last step was to compare the large crater results with those from the GRAIL crater database (Neumann et al., 2015). That work has 74 featuresD ≥ 200 km, and all but 15 of them exist in this database. The 15 not in this database are because there was no clear topographic signature, and all 15 wer”
- Global lunar-surface mapping experiment using the Lunar Imager/Spectrometer on SELENE (2008, background): “Correlating crater data of a region with radiometric ages from returned samples on the Moon, the crater counting chronology was developed to infer the ages of even unsampled geological units and provide the lunar stratigraphy (Hiesinger and Head, 2006; Neukum et al., 2001).”
- Dynamical erosion of the asteroid belt and implications for large impacts in the inner Solar System (2009, methodology): “…lower than estimates of the cratering rate of the terrestrial planets using the lunar cratering record, which give ∼ 6–18 D > 10 km impactors onto the Earth every 1 Gy using the NPF and assuming a D > 10 km object produces a 150–200 km crater (Neukum et al., 2001; Chapman and Morrison, 1994).”
- The timeline of the lunar bombardment: Revisited (2018, background): “ecessarily inconsistent with the most modern views of the cataclysm scenario: Morbidelli et al., 2012; Marchi et al., 2013). Among other prominent works that advocated the accretion tail scenario are Neukum et al. (2001), Ivanov (2001) and Werner (2014). Unfortunately, the lunar crater record does n”
- Nonuniform cratering of the terrestrial planets (2008, background): “In order to reconcile the size distribution of bolides with the average lunar crater size-frequency distribution of Neukum et al. (2001) , we consider that craters with diameters less than a few kilometers form in the porous regime, as proposed by Ivanov (2006).”