Australian evidence on corporate governance attributes and their association with forward-looking information in the annual report
By Madonna L. O'Sullivan, Majella Percy, J. Stewart. 2008
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ac9316ffb248d47c28d3e6dd0ab4088a65d1280
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- K. Hussainey
- Khaleed Omair Alotaibi
- Cemil Kuzey
- Merve Kılıç
- Tamer Elshandidy
- S. Collin
- A. Al-Qadasi
- G. Greco
Citations in the corpus
- Aggregated, Voluntary and Mandatory Risk Disclosure Incentives: Evidence from UK FTSE All Share Companies (2013, result): “This argument is supported both by their empirical evidence and that of Chavent et al. (2006) and O’Sullivan et al. (2008).”
- The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: the role of ownership concentration – Malaysian evidence (2018, methodology): “This paper further contributes to the audit literature by using a composite measure of governance mechanisms, which is stronger than individual measurement (O’Sullivan et al., 2008).”
- Sharia supervisory boards, governance structures and operational risk disclosures: Evidence from Islamic banks in MENA countries (2020, unknown): “By contrast, O’Sullivan et al. (2008) find no association between block ownership and level of risk disclosure in large listed non-financial firms.”
- Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting (2018, methodology): “There are no disclosure rules relative to whether and how to release forward-looking statements, such as pro fi t targets within the annual reports, which is determined solely by managerial discretion (O ’ Sullivan et al. , 2008).”
- Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia (2016, methodology): “Some previous research (Li et al , 2008: O ’ Sullivan et al , 2008) reports that a positive association exists between the audit committee size and the levels of voluntary disclosure.”
- What explains variation in voluntary disclosure? A study of the annual reports of corporations listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange (2010, background): “Profitable corporations are more exposed to political pressure and public scrutiny, and therefore use more self-regulating mechanisms, for instance voluntary disclosure of information, in order to avoid regulation ( Ng and Koh 1994 ).”
- Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies (2013, background): “However, it must also be acknowledged that useful decision control is unlikely to occur if meetings take place only once per year or no meetings at all are held ( Menon and Williams 1994; Collier and Gregory 1999; Mendez and Garcia 2007).”