Solid-State Fermentation Systems—An Overview
By C. Krishna. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2005
708 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ac7ec120964fc3160c1c32b6507d4091d666df9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biotechnology
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. (2015, background): “other beneficial fungi (Kiewnick, 2001; Wraight et al., 2001; Krishna, 2005; Charnley and 1392 Collins, 2007; Jaronski and Jackson, 2012).”
- Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma martiale against the black-pod disease (Phytophthora palmivora) of cacao. (2009, background): “The roles of urea as a pH-controlling compound and as a nitrogen source that tends to induce conidiation in fungal species are known (Krishna, 2005).”
- Mass Production of Entomopathogenic Fungi: State of the Art (2014, background): “An overview of solid substrate fermentation systems has been presented by Krishna (2005).”
- Economic Analysis of Cellulase Production Methods for Bio-Ethanol (2007, background): “This technology is considerably different than submerged fermentation (SmF) (Holker and Lenz, 2005; Krishna, 2005), and because of these inherent differences, solid state cultivation (SSC) has the potential to reduce enzyme production costs.”