Who benefits? The social distribution of subsidized childcare in Sweden and Flanders

By W. Van Lancker, Joris Ghysels. 2012

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ac26a2eed28840b416994abde0448616fd1c8d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. W. Van Lancker
2. E. Pavolini
3. B. Cantillon
4. A. Hemerijck
5. Frank Vandenbroucke
6. K. Vleminckx

In Political Science and International Relations

1. W. Van Lancker
2. E. Pavolini
3. B. Cantillon
4. A. Hemerijck
5. Frank Vandenbroucke
6. K. Vleminckx

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Pavolini
2. W. Van Lancker
3. B. Cantillon

Citations in the corpus

• Putting the Child-Centred Investment Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU27: (2013, background): “Few countries have followed a consistent investment approach towards employment (Bonoli, 2009; Vandenbroucke and Vleminckx, 2011).”
• The Matthew effect in childcare use: a matter of policies or preferences? (2018, background): “Only one exploratory study investigated how welfare state characteristics correlate with childcare inequality in a comparative way (Van Lancker and Ghysels 2016).”
• Three Shortcomings of the Social Investment Perspective (2013, background): “Consequently, government investment can be expected to flow first and foremost towards dual earner households, which have more financial resources at their disposal and thus more opportunities to ensure their children a better future (Ghysels and Van Lancker, 2011; Van Lancker and Ghysels, 2012).”