A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM

By Junjie Cao, Zhaoxia Heng, Jin Min Yang, Yanming Zhang, Jing-yu Zhu. 2012

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A bstractMotivated by the recent LHC hints of a Higgs boson around 125 GeV, we assume a SM-like Higgs with the mass 123-127 GeV and study its implication in low energy SUSY by comparing the MSSM and NMSSM. We consider various experimental constraints at 2σ level (including the muon g − 2 and the dark matter relic density) and perform a comprehensive scan over the parameter space of each model. Then in the parameter space which is allowed by current experimental constraints and also predicts a SM-like Higgs in 123-127 GeV, we examine the properties of the sensitive parameters (like the top squark mass and the trilinear coupling At) and calculate the rates of the di-photon signal and the V V* (V = W, Z) signals at the LHC. Our typical findings are: (i) In the MSSM the top squark and At must be large and thus incur some fine-tuning, which can be much ameliorated in the NMSSM; (ii) In the MSSM a light stau is needed to enhance the di- photon rate of the SM-like Higgs to exceed its SM prediction, while in the NMSSM the di-photon rate can be readily enhanced in several ways; (iii) In the MSSM the signal rates of pp → h → V V* at the LHC are never enhanced compared with their SM predictions, while in the NMSSM they may get enhanced significantly; (iv) A large part of the parameter space so far survived will be soon covered by the expected XENON100(2012) sensitivity (especially for the NMSSM).

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ab2a4a3ef4ebd305d9ce10ad0bf1972242bc2af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Atlas Collaboration
  2. Stefan Dittmaier
  3. M. Raidal
  4. Ansgar Denner
  5. N. Kauer
  6. K. Kannike
  7. G. Passarino
  8. M. Schönherr

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Atlas Collaboration
  2. Cms Collaboration
  3. Gudrun Heinrich
  4. Stefan Dittmaier
  5. Ansgar Denner
  6. M. Grazzini
  7. M. Schönherr
  8. Fabio Maltoni

Citations in the corpus