The function of mate choice in sticklebacks: optimizing Mhc genetics

By M. Milinski. 2003

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a9c63ccb56615072df493f96cd6a960e43fabcc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Ashley J. W. Ward
2. M. Webster
3. Paul J. B. Hart
4. Jens Krause
5. Darren P. Croft
6. Alexander D. M. Wilson
7. Janette Boughman
8. Nicole E. Rafferty

In Genetics

1. Jens Krause
2. Paul J. B. Hart
3. Ashley J. W. Ward
4. M. Webster

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Jens Krause
2. Paul J. B. Hart
3. Ashley J. W. Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues (2005, background): “…of general odour cues seems now to be blurred, previous work has led to the conclusion that sticklebacks do use individual recognition in the context of predator inspection behaviour (Milinski 1990) and in the recognition of different MHC genotypes via odour cues during mate choice (Milinski 2003).”
• Intraspecific food competition in fishes (2006, background): “1998, 2002) yet information on relatedness seems to be used mainly in mate choice by many fishes (Landry et al. 2001; Aeschlimann et al. 2003; Milinski 2003).”