Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis
By K. Kowalski, Sigrid Stagl, Reinhard Madlener, I. Omann. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009
398 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a9b5639c7b93519a9fa587430f827bcad540846
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The inclusion of social aspects in power planning (2011, methodology): “Thus, the population is represented by well-informed groups (NGO, community councilor and energy experts which are aware of the population attitude), in the case of [19,25].”
- How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated (2012, methodology): “More inclusive or participatory methods could be used to modify the criteria as part of future work and increase the transparency and robustness of the methodology (Kowalski et al., 2009; Garmendia and Stagl, 2010).”
- Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review (2011, background): “Kowalski attempted to combine participatory multi-criteria analysis (PMCA) with scenario building for analyzing energy policy making combined with public and stakeholder inputs [33].”
- Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations (2017, methodology): “In five of the ten cases, an uncertainty analysis was performed to analyse how the rankings or priority values of alternatives varied across scenarios (e.g. Kowalski et al., 2009, Scholten et al., 2015).”