A guide to extant coccolithophore taxonomy.

By J. Young. Journal of Nannoplankton Research, 2003

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a6b06b250d4375c007371b5d221247653fe59aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. A. Poulton
2. K. Baumann
3. B. Boeckel
4. C. Daniels
5. Ian Probert
6. M. Geisen
7. R. Sheward
8. A. Charalampopoulou

In Oceanography

1. Ian Probert
2. A. Poulton
3. B. Boeckel
4. K. Baumann
5. M. Geisen
6. C. Daniels
7. R. Sheward
8. A. Charalampopoulou

Citations in the corpus

• Coccolithophore ecology in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean: New perspectives from the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) programme (2017, methodology): “Around 200 species of coccolithophore are extant in the modern ocean (Young et al., 2003), with considerable diversity in the shape of the cell, the shape, construction and crystallography of the coccoliths, and their number, diversity and geometry around the cell (Monteiro et al.”
• The pan-Arctic biodiversity of marine pelagic and sea-ice unicellular eukaryotes: a first-attempt assessment (2011, background): “Globally, Gómez (2005) reported 1,555 species of free-living marine dinoflagellates in the world’s oceans, while Young et al. (2003) illustrated some 260 extant coccolithophorid taxa and Jordan et al. (2004) presented a revised classification scheme of 309 extant prymnesiophytes.”
• A review of selected aspects of coccolithophore biology with implications for paleobiodiversity estimation (2005, methodology): “Emiliania huxleyi consists of at last three genotypically distinct types or species (Young and Westbroek 1991; Bleiswijk et al. 2001; Medlin et al. 1996) and probably at least five (Findlay and Giraudeau 2000; Paasche et al 2002; Iglesias-Rodriguez et al. 2002; Young et al. 2003).”
• Biogeochemical implications of comparative growth rates of Emiliania huxleyi and Coccolithus species (2014, methodology): “The filters were examined using a Leo 1450VP scanning electron 147 microscope, with coccolithophores identified following Young et al. (2003), and enumerated 148 from 225 fields of view (Daniels et al., 2012).”
• Vertical and lateral variations in coccolithophore community structure across the subtropical frontal zone in the South Atlantic Ocean (2008, methodology): “leptoporus small type which is likely to be a subspecies (Sáez et al., 2003; Young et al., 2003) were observed in the studied plankton transect.”
• Coccolithophore dynamics in non‐bloom conditions during late summer in the central Iceland Basin (July‐August 2007) (2010, background): “Cells were identified down to species following Young et al. (2003).”
• A molecular clock for coccolithophores and implications for selectivity of phytoplankton extinctions across the K/T boundary (2008, background): “This provides some molecular support for separation of the R morphotype, which produces very heavily calcified coccoliths and appears to be confined to the SW Pacific (Young et al., 2003).”