Thoughts and Utterances
By Robyn Carston. 2002
1,259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a61e16b58573d35140d4bedf8cea1cd4bc64a6b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Deirdre Wilson
- Michael Haugh
- Ira A. Noveck
- Robyn Carston
- Richard Breheny
- Elisabeth Camp
- Guy Politzer
- Nausicaa Pouscoulous
In Philosophy
- Deirdre Wilson
- Michael Haugh
- Ira A. Noveck
- Elisabeth Camp
- Emmanuel Chemla
- K. Bach
- Richard Breheny
- Robyn Carston
Citations in the corpus
- Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction (2013, neutral): “…on speaker meaning in pragmatics to assume that the recognition and attribution of speaker intentions underlies communication, thereby grounding speaker meaning (and intentions) in a presumed cognitive reality (e.g. Bara, 2010, 2011; Carston, 2002; Levinson, 2006; Sperber and Wilson, 1995).”
- Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data (2009, background): “…philosophical debates on the semantics/pragmatics interface have provided a variety of definitions and perspectives on meaning, context and the interaction between the two, and these sustain the debate (see for instance recent works by Bach 2002; Carston 2002; Recanati 2004; Szabó 2006).”
- Intuitions and Individual Differences: The Knobe Effect Revisited (2007, background): “There are also important questions about the nature of the concepts that get elicited under these different interpretations (see e.g. Carston, 2002).”
- Expecting Irony: Context Versus Salience-Based Effects (2007, background): “On the assumption that irony stands in some contrast to (the salient meanings of the components of) what is said (Carston, 2002; Colston, 2002; Colston & O’Brien, 2000; Giora, 1995), it would require complex processes of adjustment to contextual information even when the latter is highly predictive.”
- A Developmental Investigation of Processing Costs in Implicature Production (2007, background): “There are of course variations on this theme: Children might be asked whether the puppet said it in the best possible way (Papafragou and Musolino (2003)) or which of two puppets said it best (Chierchia et al. (2004)).”
- The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation (2007, positive): “Carston (2002), for example, concludes in her comprehensive defense of the concept of explicature that “the distinction between explicatures and implicatures, the two kinds of communicated assumptions, is primarily a derivational distinction and may have no greater import than that” (p.366).”
- Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/ Pragmatics Distinction ∗ (2012, background): “Indeed, sarcasm is often presented as " the textbook case, " as Robyn Carston (2002, 15) says, of the fact that speaker's meaning can come apart from sentence meaning.”
- Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics (2011, methodology): “The broadening can be almost imperceptible, as in the following cases of approximation: 3 For recent relevance-theoretic treatments of metaphor, see e.g. Carston (2002), Higashimori (2002), Wilson and Sperber (2002), Vega Moreno (2007), Wilson and Carston (2007, 2008), Sperber and Wilson (2008).”