Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: successional sequence in Populus tremula stands

By Henrik Hedenås, L. Ericson. 2000

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a5a67e4c39aefac612e8f44a9a1a5e9e3f4d8c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Nascimbene
2. C. Ellis
3. P. Johansson
4. Mari Jönsson
5. G. Thor
6. H. Rydin
7. Swantje Löbel
8. M. Niklasson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Nascimbene
2. P. Johansson
3. Ö. Fritz
4. M. Churski
5. C. Ellis
6. A. Bergamini
7. P. Pinho
8. Giovanni Bacaro

In Plant Science

1. J. Nascimbene
2. C. Ellis
3. P. Johansson
4. Mari Jönsson
5. G. Thor
6. H. Rydin
7. Swantje Löbel
8. M. Niklasson

Citations in the corpus

• Contrasting functional traits maintain lichen epiphyte diversity in response to climate and autogenic succession (2006, background): “In many conservation assessments macrolichens are popularly applied as indicators of biodiversity (i.e. foliose, cyanobacterial epiphytes: Kuusinen, 1996; Hedenås & Ericson, 2000; Campbell & Fredeen, 2004).”
• Lichen diversity and red-listed lichen species relationships with tree species and diameter in wooded meadows (2010, background): “Furthermore, there are reports where individual lichens or lichen species richness is not clearly affected, or even negatively affected, by tree diameter (Hedenås and Ericson 2000; Löbel et al. 2006).”
• Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes – evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo‐nemoral forests (2006, background): “…reported a positive effect of tree diameter on the occurrence of individual epiphyte species (Uliczka and Angelstam 1999, Gu et al. 2001, Snäll et al. 2003), but there are also records of species which were not, or even negatively, affected by DBH (Hazell et al. 1998, Hedenås and Ericson 2000).”
• Tree and stand level variables influencing diversity of lichens on temperate broad-leaved trees in boreo-nemoral floodplain forests (2008, background): “In the forest community, high stand age implies longer colonization time for the species, which is crucial for late-successional lichens characterized by poor dispersal and colonization ability (Hedenås and Ericson 2000).”
• Tree age is a key factor for the conservation of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests. (2009, result): “The changes in species composition along the chronosequence of the phorophyte are in agreement with a study on aspen (Populus tremula) in boreal forest (Hedenås & Ericson 2000).”
• Species richness of lichen functional groups in relation to land use intensity (2006, background): “Other factors such as climatic conditions, species composition of forest trees, and insolation of the forest stand may affect occurrence of cyanolichens in forest ecosystems (Hedenås & Ericson 2000).”
• Epiphytic and epixylic lichen species diversity in Estonian natural forests (2003, background): “This species is endangered or extinct in large areas of Europe (Rose 1988), but seems to be remarkably vital in our area.”
• CYANOLICHENS: THEIR RESPONSE TO POLLUTION AND POSSIBLE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THEIR CONSERVATION IN NORTHEASTERN NORTH AMERICA (2004, background): “However, it is now apparent that any forest protocols must encourage new aspen stands that will, in course of time, be suitable for lichen colonization (Hedenas and Ericson 2000, 2002a).”
• Functional traits of epiphytic lichens as potential indicators of environmental conditions in forest ecosystems (2012, background): “…including air pollution (Cislaghi and Nimis, 1997; Giordani, 2007; Rose and Hawksworth, 1981), climate conditions (Jovan and McCune, 2004; Geiser and Neitlich, 2007; Giordani and Incerti, 2008), and forest structure and dynamics (Hedenås and Ericson, 2000; Johansson, 2008; Nascimbene et al., 2010).”
• Tree age relationships with epiphytic lichen diversity and lichen life history traits on ash in southern Sweden (2007, background): “Local climate and landscape configuration, as well as stand history, have been shown to correlate with epiphytic cryptogam communities (Halonen, Hyvärinen & Kauppi, 1991; Dettki & Esseen, 1998; Hedenås & Ericson, 2000; Johansson & Ehrlén, 2003; Snäll et al., 2004).”