Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

By D. Lieberman, Douglas Rex, S. Winawer, F. Giardiello, D. Johnson, T. Levin. Gastroenterology, 2012

1,900 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening (2018, background): “Recognition of at-risk individuals will require better collection and utilization of family history information and will be enhanced by routine genetic testing with a comprehensive cancer gene panel for all patients with early-onset CRC. Efforts must also be taken to raise awareness among clinicians”
Deep Learning for Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Whole-slide Images (2017, background): “These five classes cover the most common occurrences of colorectal polyps, and encompass all polyp types that are included in the US multi-society task force guidelines for colorectal cancer risk assessment and surveillance (Lieberman et al., 2012).”
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy (2015, methodology): “Recommended post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for sessile serrated polyps (also called sessile serrated adenomas) and traditional serrated adenomas currently are based on limited evidence and will be subject to updating as new evidence appears.(15) Serrated lesions include hyperplastic polyps,”