ABIOTIC STRESS AND HERBIVORY INTERACT TO SET RANGE LIMITS ACROSS A TWO-DIMENSIONAL STRESS GRADIENT

By Christopher D. G. Harley. 2003

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a49951a285e77b4c2cdf23ce941a3a8993b10a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Eco-engineering urban infrastructure for marine and coastal biodiversity: Which interventions have the greatest ecological benefit? (2018, background): “…Ecology 17 In the intertidal, thermal and desiccation stresses have long been implicated in setting 398 distributional limits (e.g. Wolcott 1973; Harley 2003) and the persistence of organisms can be 399 contingent on the availability of microhabitat refugia from such stressors (Silliman et al.…”
Synergistic effects associated with climate change and the development of rocky shore molluscs (2005, background): “There is already some evidence to suggest global warming can lead to a redistribution of species in intertidal rocky shore communities (Barry et al., 1995; Harley, 2003).”
EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON GLOBAL SEAWEED COMMUNITIES (2012, background): “When the upper and lower depth limits of a species are set by different agents (e.g., thermal stress, light availability, consumers; Harley 2003, Graham et al. 2007, Méléder et al. 2010), climate change can result in certain species being squeezed out of the system entirely (Harley 2011).”
Tidal dynamics, topographic orientation, and temperature-mediated mass mortalities on rocky shores (2008, background): “For example, thermal stress varies greatly from one microhabitat to the next, and organisms on north-facing surfaces in the Northern hemisphere remain cooler than their counterparts on horizontal or south-facing surfaces (Helmuth & Hofmann 2001, Harley 2003, Denny et al. 2006).”
Living on the Edge of Two Changing Worlds: Forecasting the Responses of Rocky Intertidal Ecosystems to Climate Change (2006, background): “For example, if the upper limit of a prey species is shifted downward by climate change, but the upper limit of its predator remains unaffected, the prey species may be eliminated from the ecosystem (Harley 2003).”
The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. (2006, background): “Sea level rise may also reduce the spatial extent of biogenic habitat by outpacing the accretion rates of marshes and coral reefs (Knowlton 2001; Scavia et al. 2002).”
Community ecology in a warming world: The influence of temperature on interspecific interactions in marine systems (2011, background): “Higher temperatures result in an increase of the spatial overlap between the potential vertical range of Mazzaella and that of its consumers, which in turn leads to the elimination of the alga in warm areas which lack a spatial refuge from herbivory (Harley, 2003).”
Predator–prey interactions under climate change: the importance of habitat vs body temperature (2009, background): “The potential for behavioral thermoregulation in Pisaster could thus greatly impact the consumer resource dynamics, a process that has recently been observed in the interaction between grazing limpets and seaweeds in other intertidal systems (Harley 2003).”
The role of temperature and desiccation stress in limiting the local‐scale distribution of the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea (2009, background): “…the distributional limits of organisms, over both large and small scales, has been an integral part of studies of this system (Broekhuysen 1940; Lewis 1954; Foster 1971; Wolcott 1973; Branch 1981; Williams & Morritt 1995; Stillman & Somero 2000; Harley 2003; Harley & Helmuth 2003; Harley 2008).”