LHC probes the hidden sector
By J. Jaeckel, Martin Jankowiak, Michael Spannowsky. 2012
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this note we establish LHC limits on a variety of benchmark models for hidden sector physics using 2011 and 2012 data. First, we consider a “hidden’’ U(1) gauge boson under which all Standard Model particles are uncharged at tree-level and which interacts with the visible sector either via kinetic mixing or higher dimensional operators. Second, we constrain scalar and pseudo-scalar particles interacting with the Standard Model via dimension five operators and Yukawa interactions, in particular including so-called axion-like particles. In both cases we consider several different final states, including photons, electrons, muons and taus, establishing new constraints for a range of GeV to TeV scale masses. Finally, we also comment on particles with electric charges smaller than e that arise from hidden sector matter.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a3f2fd46e7fac392d08f1e466c57bc182e4f242
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Phenomenology of a 750 GeV singlet (2015, background): “One is that the results remain unchanged if the singlet scalar is replaced by a pseudo-scalar with the effective couplings [41]:”
- Illuminating dark photons with high-energy colliders (2014, background): “The sensitivity of Z ′ searches for heavier dark photons (mZD > mZ) has been explored most recently in [71] (see also [138] for an earlier study), where limits were derived on in the range 200 .”
- Dark radiation constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon (2013, background): “The remaining bounds are taken from elsewhere: LHC [23], DM [57], COLL [57], SLAC [58], OPOS [59], TEX [96] and CMB [94, 95] (see also appendix C).”