Comparison of growth, diet and food consumption of sea-run and lake-dwelling Arctic charr

By A. Rikardsen, P. Amundsen, P. Bjørn, M. Johansen. 2000

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a20737fce13142c57e28412a6ced9129763b458

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. A. Klemetsen
2. N. Jonsson
3. B. Jonsson
4. J. Dempson
5. J. Rasmussen

In Global and Planetary Change

1. N. Jonsson
2. B. Jonsson
3. J. Rasmussen
4. A. Klemetsen
5. J. Dempson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Jonsson
2. B. Jonsson
3. A. Klemetsen
4. J. Dempson
5. P. Amundsen
6. J. Rasmussen

Citations in the corpus

• Early juvenile bioenergetic differences between anadromous and resident brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) (2003, background): “This is reasonable to assume as anadromous fish grow faster in the sea than resident fish do in fresh water (Gross 1987; Rikardsen et al. 2000).”
• Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., brown trout Salmo trutta L. and Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.): a review of aspects of their life histories (2003, background): “The same applies to anadromous charr at sea where they mainly feed on plankton and pelagic fish, but also can take littoral hyperbenthos and even surface insects (Moore & Moore 1974; Grønvik & Klemetsen 1987; Rikardsen et al. 2000; Dempson et al. 2002).”