Automation of Shear-Wave Splitting Measurements using Cluster Analysis
By Nicholas A. Teanby, J. Kendall, Mirko van der Baan. 2004
270 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a1c64e71dfd2d6224df1259fb8aadd2c41242e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- M. Long
- P. Silver
- Guilhem Barruol
- Christophe Zaroli
- Andreas Wüstefeld
- Götz Bokelmann
- Thorsten W. Becker
Citations in the corpus
- Null Detection in Shear-Wave Splitting Measurements (2007, background): “Automation gets more important with the rapid increase of seismic data over the past as well as in future years (Teanby et al., 2003).”
- SplitLab: A shear-wave splitting environment in Matlab (2008, methodology): “Different from other recent approaches (Teanby et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2006), our aim is not to fully automate the whole process.”
- Shear Wave Splitting and Mantle Anisotropy: Measurements, Interpretations, and New Directions (2009, background): “While there have been several efforts to partially or fully automate the process of making shear wave splitting measurements (e.g., Teanby et al. 2004; Evans et al. 2006), most shear wave splitting analysts continue to rely on visual inspection of individual waveforms as a final check of the data.”