MOTChallenge: A Benchmark for Single-Camera Multiple Target Tracking

By Patrick Dendorfer, Aljosa Osep, Anton Milan, Konrad Schindler, Daniel Cremers, Ian David Reid, Stefan Roth, L. Leal-Taix'e. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2020

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Standardized benchmarks have been crucial in pushing the performance of computer vision algorithms, especially since the advent of deep learning. Although leaderboards should not be over-claimed, they often provide the most objective measure of performance and are therefore important guides for research. We present MOTChallenge, a benchmark for single-camera Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) launched in late 2014, to collect existing and new data and create a framework for the standardized evaluation of multiple object tracking methods. The benchmark is focused on multiple people tracking, since pedestrians are by far the most studied object in the tracking community, with applications ranging from robot navigation to self-driving cars. This paper collects the first three releases of the benchmark: (i) MOT15, along with numerous state-of-the-art results that were submitted in the last years, (ii) MOT16, which contains new challenging videos, and (iii) MOT17, that extends MOT16 sequences with more precise labels and evaluates tracking performance on three different object detectors. The second and third release not only offers a significant increase in the number of labeled boxes, but also provide labels for multiple object classes beside pedestrians, as well as the level of visibility for every single object of interest. We finally provide a categorization of state-of-the-art trackers and a broad error analysis. This will help newcomers understand the related work and research trends in the MOT community, and hopefully shed some light into potential future research directions.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a193e0ee60efb931054c35866491ed0f08c55bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. L. Leal-Taix'e
  2. Martin Danelljan
  3. Tim Meinhardt
  4. Alexander Kirillov
  5. Luc Van Gool
  6. Christoph Mayer
  7. Christoph Feichtenhofer
  8. Danda Pani Paudel

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Philip H. S. Torr
  5. Jitendra Malik
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Trevor Darrell
  8. Christoph Feichtenhofer

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Martin Danelljan

Citations in the corpus