Gender Differences In Adolescent Drug Use

By R. Svensson. 2003

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89f27aa785289ad42e1dc8a56e18b8135e85b9a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors? (2012, unknown): “Studies consistently find that parental supervision and monitoring are less intense for boys than for girls (Svensson, 2003).”
Gender Differences in the Predictors of Juvenile Delinquency (2007, background): “This influence may be direct, or it may be indirect through its effect on involvement with peers (Svensson, 2003) or risk preferences (Hagan, 1988; Hagan & Kay, 1990).”
The Influence of Delinquen Peers on Delinquency (2005, methodology): “This longitudinal design improves on previous work by Hartjen and Priyadarsini (2003), Jensen (2003), Mears et al. (1998), and Svensson (2003), whose use of cross-sectional data precluded them from making definitive causal statements.”
Developmental trajectories of substance use from early adolescence to young adulthood: Gender and racial/ethnic differences (2011, unknown): “National statistics [1,2] and cross-sectional studies [19–21]”
Adolescent Susceptibility to Deviant Peer Pressure: Does Gender Matter? (2019, methodology): “2001), peer contagion (Cohen and Prinstein 2006), and deviancy training (e.g., Dishion et al. 1996; Svensson 2003) using sociometric nominations without measuring the direct, subjective experience of peer pressure (e.”
Perceived Support and Internalizing Symptoms in African American Adolescents: Self-Esteem and Ethnic Identity as Mediators (2007, background): “One plausible explanation may stem from research demonstrating that adolescent females are monitored more closely than adolescent males are monitored (Beck et al., 2003; Svensson, 2003), which may result in females being protected from some of the more negative experiences that, according to ethnic ”