Empirical Processes in M-Estimation
By Sara A. van de Geer. 2000
346 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Arthur Gretton
- Peter Buhlmann
- Francis R. Bach
- Michael I. Jordan
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
Citations in the corpus
- Additive models with trend filtering (2017, background): “As for part (ii), we note that Lemma 4 of Wang et al. [2014] shows that |hj`(X j)− gj`(X j)| ≤ k(2)Wj , for ` = k + 2, .”
- Optimal Rates for Random Fourier Features (2015, methodology): “[10] D.”
- On the empirical estimation of integral probability metrics (2012, neutral): “7 of [49], supf∈F |Pmf−Pf | a.”
- Variance-based Regularization with Convex Objectives (2016, methodology): “ +2 1 +2 r 2t n ! ǫ. This gives the theorem. D Proof of Theorem 4 We first show the following version of uniform Bernstein’s inequality with Rademacher complexities. The proof uses a peeling technique [3, 46], in conjuction with Talagrand’s concentration inequality (Lemma B.2). Lemma D.1. Let r > ”
- Estimating Divergence Functionals and the Likelihood Ratio by Convex Risk Minimization (2008, methodology): “stein distance. This is defined as follows: for a constant K>0, ρK(f)2 := 2K2 Z (e|f|/K −1 −|f|/K)dP. The Bernstein distance is related to the Hellinger distance in several crucial ways (see, e.g., [26], page 97): • ρ1(fg) ≤ 4hQ(g0, g+g0 2 ). • The bracketing entropy based on Bernstein distance is”
- On the mathematical foundations of learning (2001, background): “On the other hand, entropy numbers have a strong history in related contexts (see [21], [44], [24], [41]).”
- CAM: Causal Additive Models, high-dimensional order search and penalized regression (2013, background): “see Bühlmann and van de Geer (2011, Ch.5.6,Th.8.2). Assumption (B2,ii) can be ensured by assuming maxj |Aj | ≤M1 <∞ and e.g. group restricted eigenvalue assumptions for the design matrix (with the given basis); see Zhang and Huang (2008) and van de Geer et al.”
- Local Rademacher complexities (2005, methodology): “Results of this type have been obtained, among others by van de Geer [33, 34] who even provides non-asymptotic exponential inequalities.”
- On integral probability metrics, φ-divergences and binary classification (2009, positive): “The following result is quoted from [52, Theorem 3.7].”
- On strong identifiability and convergence rates of parameter estimation in finite mixtures (2016, methodology): “If we fit the data to a mixture of k = k0+1 = 4 Gaussian distributions, however, we observe empirically that the convergence rate of W4(Ĝn, G0) (thus W2 distance) is almost n−1/8 up to a logarithmic term.”
- Obfuscation via Information Density Estimation (2019, background): “(27) Moreover, since G is compact and g is continuous, the functions g and eg satisfy the uniform law of large numbers [60].”
- Robust semiparametric M-estimation and the weighted bootstrap (2005, methodology): “This aspect has been well studied for general M-estimators in VW and van de Geer (2000).”
- Threshold quantile autoregressive models (2011, neutral): “Therefore by Lemma 3.10 in van de Geer (2000) we have that H1,B(δ,P, P ) ∞, that is, the δ-entropy with bracketing of P is finite.”
- Statistical Analysis of Some Multi-Category Large Margin Classification Methods (2004, methodology): “This method, widely studied in the statistics literature, is often referred to ashe method of sieves(for example, see Chapter 10 of van de Geer, 2000, and references therein).”
- Regularized Policy Iteration with Nonparametric Function Spaces (2016, methodology): “2 by van de Geer (2000), with two main differences: 1) It holds uniformly over Q and 2) ĥn(·;Q) uses the same data Dn that is used to estimate Q itself.”