Additive partitioning of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple spatial scales

By Sonja Stendera, Richard K. Johnson. 2005

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: The roles of habitat types and non-native species (2007, methodology): “…Biology, 52, 1400–1415 I used the recently proposed approach of additive partitioning (e.g. Loreau, 2000; Wagner et al., 2000; Veech et al., 2002; Gering et al., 2003; Stendera & Johnson, 2005) to examine the contribution of running water habitat types to ecoregion level species diversity.”
Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses (2010, methodology): “In fact, a very high similarity value using the Gini–Simpson index is universal in additive partitioning studies of high-diversity ecosystems (e.g. DeVries et al., 1997; Gering et al., 2003; Summerville et al., 2003, 2006; Stendera & Johnson, 2005; Chandy et al., 2006; Ribeiro et al., 2008).”
Spatial scale and the diversity of macroinvertebrates in a Neotropical catchment (2010, background): “…has been favoured as a methodological approach to understand the relative importance of community heterogeneity among several spatial scales (Wagner, Wildi & Ewald, 2000; Crist et al., 2003; Gering, Crist & Veech, 2003; Stendera & Johnson, 2005; Tylianakis et al., 2006; Ribeiro et al., 2008).”
Biodiversity of Aquatic Insects: Spatial Gradients and Environmental Correlates of Assemblage-Level Measures at Large Scales (2009, unknown): “A study on Swedish streams and lakes yielded a weakly asymptotic mean LSR to RSR relationship in both habitat types (Stendera & Johnson, 2005).”