Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory

By Sharon Y. Strauss, Jennifer A. Rudgers, Jennifer A. Lau, Rebecca E. Irwin. 2002

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89c6b0bca69065ea23b3b6453e4c03a6d7c4954b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant (2010, unknown): “Plant defence involves fitness costs (Strauss & Agrawal 1999; Strauss et al. 2002) and the costs of tolerance and resistance may differ between populations (Pilson 2000; Fornoni et al. 2004).”
The dual role of floral traits: Pollinator attraction and plant defense (2004, unknown): “…provide a fairly constant and effective deterrence against robbers might incur both allocation costs (resource-based trade-offs between resistance and fitness) and ecological costs (trade-offs between resistance traits and interactions with other organisms, such as mutualists; Strauss et al. 2002).”
EXTRAFLORAL NECTAR AS A RESOURCE MEDIATING MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS (2004, unknown): “Costs of EF nectar may be expressed physiologically (direct costs) or ecologically via interactions involving other species (ecological costs) (Strauss et al. 2002).”
Induced defences in marine and freshwater phytoplankton: a review (2011, background): “Lürling & Van Donk, 2000), but studies showing that costs can be fairly high are starting to accumulate (Strauss et al., 2002; Cipollini et al., 2003), although most of the work has been done on terrestrial plants rather than on phytoplankton (but see, e.”
The role of environmental generalist species in ecosystem function (2005, background): “Some studies have demo trated costs of plasticity (Bergelson and Purringto 996; DeWitt, 1998; DeWitt et al., 1998; Semlits t al., 2000; Kassen, 2002), often measured as t osts of induced responses to environmental condi Agrawal et al., 1999; Strauss et al., 2002).”
How do belowground organisms influence plant–pollinator interactions? (2015, unknown): “Plants produce an enormous variety of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as attractants (Dudareva and Pichersky 2006), and floral tissues may contain defensive chemical that provide resistance against floral herbivores (McCall and Irwin 2006) while also influencing pollinators (Strauss et al. 2002).”
Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence (2011, background): “It appears that negative consequences of investing in resistance may come in the form of reduced interactions with mutualists, including pollinators, microbial symbionts, fruit dispersers, and natural enemies of herbivores (Strauss et al. 2002).”
Enemies of herbivores can shape plant traits: Selection in a facultative ant-plant mutualism (2004, unknown): “Recent evidence supports the idea that ecological trade-offs are important components of the costs of defenses in other plant–herbivore systems (reviewed by Strauss et al. 2002).”
Sites of synthesis, biochemistry and functional role of plant volatiles (2010, background): “Although defensesmight benefit plants, the expression of plant resistance can be costly in the absence of plant enemies (Bergelson and Purrington, 1996; Strauss et al., 2002).”
Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals (2009, background): “…and have since found genetic (heritable) and environmentally induced variation in both traits (Simms & Triplett 1994; Fineblum & Rausher 1995; Tiffin & Rausher 1999; Stowe et al. 2000; Koskela et al. 2002; Kover & Schaal 2002; Strauss et al. 2002; Kniskern & Rausher 2006; Du et al. 2008).”
Out Of The Quagmire Of Plant Defense Hypotheses (2003, background): “But total cost of resistance is likely to reflect other mechanisms than just “allocation costs” (costs via diversion of energy and nutrients), in particular ecological costs (Purrington 2000; Strauss et al. 2002).”