Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?
By A. Exnerová, P. Štys, Eva Fucíková, S. Veselá, K. Svádová, Milena Prokopová, V. Jarošı́k, R. Fuchs, E. Landová. 2007
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89c449170940ef5bf5b0c641bab4228eb0e2a484
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Quantifying predation on folivorous insect larvae: the perspective of life‐history evolution (2011, background): “Warning coloration never gives full protection against all predators (Endler & Mappes, 2004; Mappes, Marples & Endler, 2005; Exnerová et al., 2007; Sandre, Tammaru & Mänd, 2007), and it may considerably increase the detectability of prey to the set of undeterred predators (Mänd et al.”
- Role of different colours of aposematic insects in learning, memory and generalization of naïve bird predators (2009, background): “Naı̈ve great tits have no innate avoidance of red wild-type firebugs (Exnerová et al. 2007); nevertheless, they may still hesitate longer to attack a certain colour form.”
- Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth (2011, background): “Predator–prey experiments addressing the evolution of aposematism often focus on 1 or 2 predator species (but see Exnerová et al. 2003, 2007).”