The Representational Character of Experience

By David J. Chalmers. 2004

405 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89bcfed7dce4a640f0ca5d747e2891e08b9411d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ned Block
2. Bence Nanay
3. Charles Siewert
4. Adam Pautz

In Philosophy

1. Ned Block
2. Bence Nanay
3. Charles Siewert
4. Adam Pautz

Citations in the corpus

• Is Experience Transparent? (2004, background): “For a detailed discussion of different “intentionalisms” about consciousness, reductive and non-reductive, see Chalmers (2004) .”
• Why explain visual experience in terms of content (2010, background): “For the property of having some property that plays the red-role, see Chalmers (2004).”
• Attention and perceptual content (2010, background): “(Chalmers 2004: 161 – note that Chalmers considers this example Analysis Vol 0 | Number 0 | 2010 | pp. 1–7 doi:10.1093/analys/anp165 The Author 2009.”
• ATTENTION AND MENTAL PAINT (2010, background): “David Chalmers ( 2004 ) notes that if one shifts attention back and forth between two pinpoint red lights , one ' s phenomenology changes .”
• The epistemic impact of the etiology of experience (2013, neutral): “ Self-‐representational  contents  of  various  sorts  are  defended  by  Searle  (1983),   Chalmers  (2004),  Kriegel  (2009),  Siegel  (2006).”