Fauna-habitat relationships: a basis for identifying key stand structural attributes in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bird's Response to Revegetation of Different Structure and Floristics—Are “Restoration Plantings” Restoring Bird Communities? (2011, background): “In addition, we investigated the effects of resources such as shrubs, logs and old trees (McElhinny et al. 2006), riparian or non-riparian location (Palmer & Bennett 2006), patch size (Mac Nally & Watson 1997; Kavanagh et al. 2007), and the amount of surrounding vegetation cover in the landscape…”
Faunal response to revegetation in agricultural areas of Australia: A review (2007, background): “For example, amphibians and reptiles respond predominantly to complexity in the ground layer, and small terrestrial mammals respond to complexity in the mid- and understorey layer (McElhinny et al. 2006).”
The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves (2013, background): “For example, eucalypt species of the Monocalyptus subgenera, for example, stringybarks and scribbly gums, have lower foliage nutrient levels, poorer invertebrate assemblages and are less likely to produce hollows compared with species of the Symphyomyrtus subgenera, for example, boxes and red gums (”
An objective and quantitative methodology for constructing an index of stand structural complexity (2006, methodology): “temperate ecosystems (McElhinny et al., 2006).”