Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology

By S. Poggenpohl. 2007

543 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Somaesthetic Appreciation Design (2016, background): “Or as expressed by Löwgren and Stolterman, we had to access the dynamic gestalt of the interaction [30].”
Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments (2016, background): “, reflective HCI [111, 84, 1], critical HCI [11, 10], activist HCI [61, 19, 65], third-paradigm HCI [58]) have identified similar issues and often advocate that that designers and researchers should turn an analytical gaze to their own practices.”
Material Driven Design (MDD): A Method to Design for Material Experiences (2015, methodology): “In HCI, tinkering is to do with crafting interactive artifacts using physicaldigital materials (Buxton, 2007; Holmquist, 2012; Löwgren & Stolterman, 2004; Sundström & Höök, 2010; Zimmerman, Forlizzi, & Evenson, 2007).”
An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach (2010, background): “A few also mentioned Löwgren and Stolterman’s Thoughtful Interaction Design, noting how it characterizes the designer during the activity of design [27].”