The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial

By K. Shine. 2009

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/898860253a91567805d13c599e68ccc51111c9f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. G. Myhre
2. J. Pongratz
3. D. Shindell
4. Felix Creutzig
5. Piers M. Forster
6. K. Shine

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. Myhre
2. D. Shindell
3. Felix Creutzig
4. M. Delucchi
5. Yi Yang
6. Lutz Sager
7. Judd B. Kessler
8. Hunt Allcott

Citations in the corpus

• Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics:a multi-model analysis (2012, unknown): “The GWP has been critiqued from several angles (e.g., Shine, 2009; O’Neill, 2000) and an important critique is that the AGWP does not directly translate into a well-known climate response.”
• Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers (2014, background): “It is important to recognize that there is a vigorous debate over the appropriateness of using GWPs to estimate climate impacts (Tol et al. 2012; Manning and Reisinger 2011; Shine 2009; Smith and Wigley 2000a; Smith and Wigley 2000b; Delucchi 2011a).”
• Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing (2014, background): “Cost implications at the project or country level could be substantial under some circumstances (Godal and Fuglestvedt, 2002; Shine, 2009; Reisinger et al., 2013).”