Imperfect Forward Secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman Fails in Practice

By David Adrian, Karthikeyan Bhargavan, Zakir Durumeric, P. Gaudry, Matthew D. Green, J. Alex Halderman, Nadia Heninger, Drew Springall, Emmanuel Thomé, Luke Valenta and 4 more. Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2015

510 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the security of Diffie-Hellman key exchange as used in popular Internet protocols and find it to be less secure than widely believed. First, we present Logjam, a novel flaw in TLS that lets a man-in-the-middle downgrade connections to "export-grade" Diffie-Hellman. To carry out this attack, we implement the number field sieve discrete log algorithm. After a week-long precomputation for a specified 512-bit group, we can compute arbitrary discrete logs in that group in about a minute. We find that 82% of vulnerable servers use a single 512-bit group, allowing us to compromise connections to 7% of Alexa Top Million HTTPS sites. In response, major browsers are being changed to reject short groups. We go on to consider Diffie-Hellman with 768- and 1024-bit groups. We estimate that even in the 1024-bit case, the computations are plausible given nation-state resources. A small number of fixed or standardized groups are used by millions of servers; performing precomputation for a single 1024-bit group would allow passive eavesdropping on 18% of popular HTTPS sites, and a second group would allow decryption of traffic to 66% of IPsec VPNs and 26% of SSH servers. A close reading of published NSA leaks shows that the agency's attacks on VPNs are consistent with having achieved such a break. We conclude that moving to stronger key exchange methods should be a priority for the Internet community.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89737e769729c28681a6c245e37c60ff31b9e30c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Peter Schwabe
  2. Léo Ducas
  3. Thomas Pöppelmann
  4. E. Alkım
  5. Michael Bailey
  6. J. Alex Halderman
  7. Omar Alrawi
  8. Fabian Monrose

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Omar Alrawi
  2. Léo Ducas
  3. Fabian Monrose
  4. Manos Antonakakis
  5. Chaz Lever

Citations in the corpus