The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft
By J. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, A. Marvasti, Karyn McKinney Marvasti. 2012
865 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/895e257c671208041215782c254da8a0ba747396
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Veen
- T. Barratt
- Caleb Goods
- Kit C. Myers
- Brandy M. Jenner
- Michael J. Culbertson
- C. Carlson
- K. Ryan
Citations in the corpus
- Focus Group Evidence (2014, methodology): “Building on recent developments in social science methodology (e.g., Belzile & Oberg, 2012; Farnsworth & Boon, 2010; Morgan, 2012), we describe how different research designs are required to gather different types of information with focus groups.”
- Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: a need for teacher–student partnerships (2020, background): “Multiple interviews develop trust and rapport which encourage students to gain more confidence to speak openly (Grinyer & Thomas, 2012).”
- Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: a comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts (2018, background): “With this in mind, several researchers have recently called for more research on synchronous online interviewing platforms, including Skype (Deakin & Wakefield, 2014; Hanna, 2012; Seitz, 2016). While qualitative researchers frequently note the utility of Skype and other video chat interview platform”
- “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector (2019, methodology): “In order to solicit an adequate number of informants, a multi-tiered participant recruitment strategy was employed, relying on a combination of street intercepts (Herzog, 2012), online participant recruitments initiatives (Mendelson, 2007) and snowball sampling techniques (Biernacki and Waldorf, 198”
- Accomplishing “rapport” in qualitative research interviews: Empathic moments in interaction (2018, background): “…respect, and consent; a sensitivity to power relations and the co-construction of knowledge; and a recognition that researchers are carrying out research with their participants, not on them (Gubrium et al. 2012; Kvale and Brinkmann 2009; Nagy Hesse-Biber 2013; Pillow 2003; Rubin and Rubin 2011).”