Cosmological and astrophysical parameters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey flux power spectrum and hydrodynamical simulations of the Lyman α forest

By M. Viel, M. Haehnelt. 2005

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The flux power spectrum of the Lyman a forest in quasar [quasi-stellar object (QSO)] absorption spectra is sensitive to a wide range of cosmological and astrophysical parameters and instrumental effects. Modelling the flux power spectrum in this large parameter space to an accuracy comparable to the statistical uncertainty of large samples of QSO spectra is very challenging. We use here a coarse grid of hydrodynamical simulations run with GADGET-2 to obtain a 'best-guess' model around which we calculate a finer grid of flux power spectra using a Taylor expansion of the flux power spectrum to first order. In this way, we investigate how the interplay between astrophysical and cosmological parameters affects their measurements using the recently published flux power spectrum obtained from 3035 Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) QSOs. We find that the SDSS flux power spectrum alone is able to constrain a wide range of parameters including the amplitude of the matter power spectrum σ 8 , the matter density Ω m , the spectral index of primordial density fluctuations n, the effective optical depth τ eff and its evolution. The thermal history of the intergalactic medium (IGM) is, however, poorly constrained and the SDSS data favour either an unplausibly large temperature or an unplausibly steep temperature-density relation. By enforcing a thermal history of the IGM consistent with that inferred from high-resolution QSO spectra, we find the following values for the best-fitting model (assuming a flat universe with a cosmological constant and zero neutrino mass): Ω m = 0.28 ± 0.03, n = 0.95 ± 0.04 and σ 8 = 0.91 ± 0.07 (1σ error bars). The values for a 8 and n are consistent with those obtained by McDonald et al. with different simulations for similar assumptions. We argue, however, that the major uncertainties in this measurement are still systematic rather than statistical.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/894b383c345a42112276f7f03f348511cb144754

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Instrumentation

Citations in the corpus

A lower bound on the mass of dark matter particles (2008, background): “Therefore, various simplifying approximations have to be realized [30, 33–39].”
The Evolution of the Intergalactic Medium (2015, background): “…parameter determinations from PF (with skeptics pointing to the high value of σ8, the seemingly unphysical temperatures that the analyses favor, or discrepancies between their mean transmission inferences and more direct measurements; Viel & Haehnelt 2006; Becker & Bolton 2013), at the .”