Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities (2011, background): “Inter-specific competition can have strong structuring effects on a species’ distribution (Amarasekare, 2008), especially when space and resources are limiting (Lotka, 1925; Volterra, 1926).”
Dispersal and diversity in experimental metacommunities: linking theory and practice (2016, background): “…effects of local interactions through food web modules, allowing prey and predator dispersal to vary independently, and quantifying how dispersal alters food web metrics (Rooney et al. 2006, Amarasekare 2008, Pillai et al. 2011, Rip and McCann 2011, Haegeman and Loreau 2014, LeCraw et al. 2014).”
Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents (2012, background): “Some community modules are particularly well studied, for instance in food webs (Amarasekare, 2008).”
Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. (2011, background): “Theory predicts that coexistence of competitors and of apparent competitors and persistence of consumer–resource systems are higher when dispersal rates between patches of the same cover type are reduced, because of reduced cross-patch synchrony in system dynamics (reviewed in Amarasekare 2008).”