A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model.

By T. Widiger, Paul T. Costa, R. McCrae. 2002

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/893efc7e1d745c3b83d19a5ba5175d66ab7f1beb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. D. Samuel
2. Timothy Trull
3. T. Widiger
4. Joshua D. Miller
5. L. Clark
6. A. Aldao

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Samuel
2. T. Widiger
3. Timothy Trull
4. L. Clark
5. Robert Krueger
6. Joshua D. Miller
7. S. Hyman
8. Terry Gutkin

Citations in the corpus

• Critique of the five-factor model of personality (2008, unknown): “The idea of differentiating various DSM-IV defined personality disorders in terms of the FFM was discussed by Widiger et al. (2002), who reported, for example, that borderline personality disorder correlated highly with the Neuroticism dimension; that schizotypal personality disorder correlated…”
• Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, methodology): “Widiger, Costa, and McCrae (2002) proposed a four-step procedure for an FFM diagnosis of personality disorder.”
• Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders--fifth edition. (2005, methodology): “Widiger, Costa, and McCrae (2002), for example, propose a comparable four-step procedure for the diagnosis of personality disorders.”