Self‐Organization in Developmental Processes: Can Systems Approaches Work?

By E. Thelen. 2008

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/892762077260d0d091e23e4bfa7fe80df95ec821

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Linda B. Smith
2. David C. Witherington

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Linda B. Smith
2. David C. Witherington
3. W. Overton

Citations in the corpus

• The Dynamic Systems Approach as Metatheory for Developmental Psychology (2007, background): “Despite widespread rejection of traditional nature-nurture dichotomies, developmental theorizing, even in its modern guises, too often appeals to some form of preexistent design when explaining developmental change [Oyama, 1985; Thelen, 1989; Thelen & Smith, 1994].”
• Dynamic Systems Theories (2007, methodology): “How different is dynamical systems as a theory of development from other approaches? Thelen and Bates (2003) recently considered this question and their conclusions are summarized in Table 6.”