The inverse crime

By A. Wirgin. 2004

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The inverse crime occurs when the same (or very nearly the same) theoretical ingredients are employed to synthesize as well as to invert data in an inverse problem. This act has been qualified as trivial and therefore to be avoided by Colton and Kress.

Subfields: Condensed Matter Physics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8925e2d347ba8cd69c9f13c92c177cfaeb1316e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Condensed Matter Physics

1. Daniel Straub
2. A. Kamariotis
3. Eleni N. Chatzi

In Genetics

1. Daniel Straub
2. A. Kamariotis
3. Eleni N. Chatzi

Citations in the corpus

• A framework for quantifying the value of vibration-based structural health monitoring (2022, methodology): “The forward linear FE model G predicting the eigenvalues for the Bayesian updating process is the same FE model as the one used in the SHM modal data sampling process, which constitutes a so-called inverse crime [60].”
• Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imaging (2020, unknown): “learning methods commit the “inverse crime” [162] by assuming the forward model and ground truth images are discrete, when in fact they are defined in a continuous domain.”