The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis
By D. Magoulick, R. Kobza. 2003
580 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/890bc54dd929da8d99432e222801da28926b40c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
- Julian D. Olden
- A. Arthington
- B. Pusey
- M. Kennard
- S. Balcombe
- N. LeRoy Poff
- E. García‐Berthou
- John J. Wiens
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Julian D. Olden
- David B. Lindenmayer
- N. LeRoy Poff
- A. Arthington
- M. Kennard
- B. Pusey
- J. Fischer
- L. Fahrig
Citations in the corpus
- Fish assemblages of an Australian dryland river: abundance, assemblage structure and recruitment patterns in the Warrego River, Murray-Darling Basin (2006, unknown): “During dry periods, fish are confined to isolated floodplain and channel waterholes or ‘refugia’ (Morton et al. 1995; Magoulick and Kobza 2003), where assemblage structure is typically highly 50 variable from one waterhole and river reach to another, as observed in many of the world’s floodplain riv”
- Invertebrate assemblages of pools in arid‐land streams have high functional redundancy and are resistant to severe drying (2014, background): “…seasonal droughts and anthropogenic water use, water resource managers may be able to avoid catastrophic biodiversity losses during droughts by maintaining small aquatic refuges along the stream channel until water demands subside or drought ends (Magoulick & Kobza, 2003; Chester & Robson, 2011).”
- Temporal changes in fish abundance in response to hydrological variability in a dryland floodplain river (2009, background): “Overall, these different patterns of species dominance reflect the highly dynamic nature of fish assemblages in Cooper Creek due to the interplay of factors such as colonization and extinction, competition, predation and changes to habitat structure and food resources among waterholes (Magoulick and”
- Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network (2007, background): “The importance of specific drought adaptations (e.g., cocoons) or the hyporheos as a refuge ( Magoulick & Kobza, 2003; Hose et al., 2005; Bogan & Lytle, 2007) has not been investigated in this paper, but probably this was one of the main reasons of rapid colonization of the streams studied together”
- Acoustic noise reduces foraging success in two sympatric fish species via different mechanisms (2014, background): “…to resume foraging quickly after noise exposure and to compensate for missed foraging opportunities, as well as the possibility to take refuge from elevated noise levels, may play an important role in the resilience of species to impacts of noise on foraging performance (Magoulick & Kobza, 2003).”
- Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems: ecological principles and consequences of alteration (2012, background): “Refugia act as sources for biotic recovery after lowflow events (Magoulick and Kobza 2003, Sheldon et al. 2010).”
- Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia (2007, background): “Long-term flow conditions also determine the spatial variability and connectivity of habitats that, in turn, influence local colonisation and extinction events (Magoulick and Kobza 2003; Matthews and Marsh-Matthews 2003; Scheurer et al. 2003).”
- Climate change and its implications for Australia's freshwater fish (2011, background): “By definition, refuge habitats are a relative concept and depend on the species present, their adaptations and the spatial and temporal scale of disturbance (reviewed in Magoulick and Kobza 2003).”
- Predatory Fish Removal and Native Fish Recovery in the Colorado River Mainstem (2005, background): “It would also provide opportunities to actively manage these species, which introduced fish p e rsp e ctiv e hopefully will lead to the knowledge required for their eventual recovery (Williams 1991; Rinne and Turner 1991; Magoulick and Kobza 2003).”
- A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. (2007, background): “Magoulick & Kobza 2003 ) and quantifying the extent to which biological legacies modify post-disturbance conditions and influence ecosystem recovery (Lindenmayer & Noss 2006).”
- Comparing fish assemblages and trophic ecology of permanent and intermittent reaches in a Mediterranean stream (2010, background): “In these pools, abiotic (increased water temperature, reduced stream flow and lower oxygen concentration) and biotic interactions (predation and competition for space and food) are intense (Spranza & Stanley, 2000; Lake, 2003; Magoulick & Kobza, 2003 ).”