What the face reveals : basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS)
By Paul Ekman, E. Rosenberg. 2005
2,165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/890b82514abb9be893fd6054d3520956449b612e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Weihong Deng
- Shan Li
- Mohammad H. Mahoor
- Louis-philippe Morency
- Maja Pantic
- Vinay Bettadapura
- Fernando De la Torre
- U. Scherer
Citations in the corpus
- Distract Your Attention: Multi-Head Cross Attention Network for Facial Expression Recognition (2021, background): “Introduction Facial expressions are direct and fundamental social signals in human communication [1,2].”
- Facial Expression Analysis (2011, background): “These differences can signal different communicative intentions [62], levels of distress [9], and presents a challenge for detection and classification; (6) and the number of possible combinations of 40+ individual action units numbers in the thousands (more than 7000 action unit combinations have b”
- Facial emotion recognition using convolutional neural networks (FERC) (2020, methodology): “In the facial action coding system (FACS) [6], action units are used as expression markers.”
- MISA: Modality-Invariant and -Specific Representations for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (2020, methodology): “Both MOSI and MOSEI use Facet 3 to extract facial expression features, which include facial action units and face pose based on the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) [14].”
- Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Survey (2018, background): “Two additional models were developed to describe a larger range of emotional landscapes: the FACS model [10], [137], where various facial muscle AUs were combined to describe the visible appearance changes in facial expressions, and the dimensional model [11], [213], where two continuous-valued vari”
- Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning (2011, methodology): “For modeling emotions of the pedagogical agent, models of emotional expression are applied (e. g. Ekman & Friesen, 1978; Ekman & Rosenberg, 2005).”