Alphabet Soup

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Significance tests as sorcery: Science is empirical—significance tests are not (2012, background): “Sadly, the social sciences took no notice and the influence of Fisher’s early work is still ubiquitous (Hubbard, 2004).”
Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing (2008, background): “In addition, α is a prescription for behaviors (accepting or rejecting H0), not a means of assessing evidence; is a pre-selected fixed measure, not a random variable; and applies only to long-run repeated random sampling from the same population, not to single experiments (Hubbard, 2004).”
Abandon Statistical Significance (2017, background): “…statistical paradigm for research, publication, and discovery in the biomedical and social sciences (see, for example, Morrison and Henkel (1970); Gigerenzer (1987); Sawyer and Peter (1983); McCloskey and Ziliak (1996); Gill (1999); Anderson et al. (2000); Gigerenzer (2004); Hubbard (2004)).”