The Social Amplification of Risk: Contents
By Nick F. Pidgeon, R. Kasperson, Paul Slovic. 2003
989 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88e3bf813f678a95f71fd2f43b8d12bbd789a6b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- S. van der Linden
- R. Gifford
- Nick F. Pidgeon
- J. Reser
- Graham Bradley
- S. Clayton
- W. Poortinga
- Elke U. Weber
Citations in the corpus
- Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation (2004, background): “The full focus group protocol is reported in detail in Pidgeon et al. (2003).”
- Perceptions and expectations of price changes and inflation: A review and conceptual framework (2008, neutral): “1 by the term social amplification (Pidgeon et al., 2003).”
- Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes (2011, background): “Nuclear accidents have, through processes of ‘social amplification’ (Pidgeon et al., 2003), contributed to nuclear power becoming a highly stigmatised energy technology (Flynn, 2003).”
- Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation (2003, background): “Pidgeon et al. (2003) posit that what is frequently called trust or distrust exists along a continuum, 2 Subsidiary analysis using structural equation modeling suggests that the relationship between value similarity, the “conventional” aspects of trust, and trust in risk regulation may be more…”
- Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? (2010, background): “…impact from wind turbines tends to become minimal at short distances (i.e. 5–7 km); anticipated impact is likely to be less restricted by physical reality and hence more open to speculation, myth-propagation, and social or media amplification (see Pidgeon et al., 2003; see also Braunholtz, 2003).”
- Ethics and Climate Change Cost-Benefit Analysis: Stern and After (2009, background): “These concerns are now widely discussed in the literature on the social perception of risk (Pidgeon et al. 2003); to the list could be added considerations surrounding the cause of the risk, such as whether it was due to incompetence, negligence or malice – or natural causes.”
- Communication and Mental Processes: Experiential and Analytic Processing of Uncertain Climate Information (2007, background): “Research on risk amplification (Pidgeon et al., 2003) and emotional contagion (Barsade, 2002) suggests that groups—just as individuals—are more motivated by concrete (affective and experiential) information than statistical information when they decide which risks to pay attention to and when to tak”
- Public understanding of climate change in the United States. (2011, neutral): “Such arguments about climate risks have been described in an influential line of research under the rubric of " social amplification of risk " (e.g., Kasperson et al., 1988; also see Hulme, 2009).”
- Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy (2012, background): “The influence of political events on people’s attitudes to climate change noted above is an example of how the larger phenomenon comprising the changing social context, at any particular point in time, can serve to amplify or attenuate perceptions of risk (Pidgeon et al., 2003).”
- Risk and risk management in management accounting and control (2013, background): “Recent world events including the global financial crisis, the financial crisis facing the Eurozone, the horsemeat scandal, the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, the floods in Thailand and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico have all refocused and intensified interest in risk, the n”