Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen

By H. Berger. 1929

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The development of theta and alpha neural oscillations from ages 3 to 24 years (2021, background): “In adult EEG, the dominant oscillation most commonly falls within the alpha-band range of 8− 12 Hz (Berger, 1929; Chiang et al., 2011; Klimesch, 1999), but during early childhood, the dominant oscillation appears to be within the theta-band frequency range (Lodder and van Putten, 2011;…”
Simultaneous invasive and non-invasive recordings in humans: A novel Rosetta stone for deciphering brain activity (2024, unknown): “First used in humans in 1929 by Hans Berger (Berger, 1929), the EEG captures the electrical activity of neurons in the human cerebral cortex through conducting electrodes placed on the scalp.”
Revolutionizing Pediatric Neurophysiology With Magnetoencephalography (2026, unknown): “…between maturation of parietal-occipital alpha rhythms modulated by closing and opening the eyes (Klimesch 1999; Adrian and Matthews 1934; Berger 1929), sensorimotor alpha rhythms modulated by somatosensory input and movements (mu rhythms) (Salmelin and Hari 1994; Tiihonen et al. 1989),…”
Confirmation of a Useful Dark‐Room Resting‐State Procedure: Periodic and Aperiodic MEG Activity in Children (2026, unknown): “As RS alpha activity is highest when an individual is at rest with their eyes closed, electrophysiology studies typically obtain RS measures with the eyes closed (Klimesch 1999; Berger 1929; Adrian and Matthews 1934; Edgar et al. 2023).”
RELAX‐Jr: An Automated Pre‐Processing Pipeline for Developmental EEG Recordings (2024, unknown): “Furthermore, many of the biological artefacts, such as electromyographic (EMG) activity, movement-related interference, and eye blinks/ocular artefacts, are often more common and pronounced in children (Brooker et al. 2020; Herve et al. 2022).”
Cell type-specific excitability probed by optogenetic stimulation depends on the phase of the alpha oscillation (2022, background): “In parallel to the distinctions in stimulation mechanisms, single neuron response is accessible to highly localized intracranial electrophysiology but not to non-invasive measurements of excitability such as MEP, phosphene, or scalp EEG, while macroscopic and network effects domanifest at themotor, ”