Coping with Challenge: Welfare in Animals including Humans

By M. Mendl. 2001

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88da2df1ad40bc7d2b156a2201720c4e4cf53e2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, unknown): “how strongly an animal avoids an aversive stimulus [87,91].”
An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood (2010, background): “Q2 states have received very little attention and yet their role in recovery processes and the general well-being of animals may be significant (cf. Porges 2001).”
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. (2007, background): “Besides acting at amygdaloid sites, oxytocin also acts at the mesolimbic axis, the nucleus accumbens in particular, where it triggers dopamine release in the context of social bonding [69].”
Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition (2011, background): “These individual differences often become conspicuous and easily measurable when individuals have to cope with challenges in their social and non-social environments (Broom, 2001; Koolhaas et al., 2010; Carere et al., 2010).”
The polyvagal perspective. (2007, background): “The neural pathways originating in several cranial nerves that regulate the striated muscles of the face and head (i.e., special visceral efferent) and the myelinated vagal fibers form the neural substrate of the social engagement system (see Porges, 1998, 2001a, 2003).”
The Darwinian concept of stress: benefits of allostasis and costs of allostatic load and the trade-offs in health and disease. (2005, background): “[41] Koolhaas JM, de Boer SF, Buwalda B, Vegt van der BJ.”