Simulation of the Askervein Flow. Part 1: Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes Equations (k∈ Turbulence Model)

By F. A. Castro, J. Palma, A. Silva Lopes. 2003

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

ONE- and TWO-Equation Models for Canopy Turbulence (2004, methodology): “In fact, such models, known as two-equation models or K–e models are among the most popular computational models in engineering applications (Bradshaw et al., 1991; Launder, 1996; Speziale, 1996; Pope, 2000) and more recently in atmospheric flows over complex terrain (Castro et al., 2003).”
The Bolund Experiment, Part I: Flow Over a Steep, Three-Dimensional Hill (2011, methodology): “Again the Askervein experiment continues to serve well for comparison with these non-linear models (Castro et al. 2003; Lopes et al. 2007; Chow and Street 2009; Bechmann and Sørensen 2010).”
The Bolund Experiment, Part II: Blind Comparison of Microscale Flow Models (2011, methodology): “Similar to the linear models, the Askervein Hill is a popular test case for RANS models (e.g. Castro et al. 2003; Raithby et al. 1987; Eidsvik 2005; Undheim et al. 2006).”
A Note on Two-Equation Closure Modelling of Canopy Flow (2009, methodology): “Figure1 shows a simulated ABL wind evolution and the key surface characteristics such as friction velocity, u∗, and the Obukhov length scale, L (e.g. Businger et al. 1971 ).”