Analytical formulae connecting the “real” and the “apparent” nucleation rate and the nuclei number concentration for atmospheric nucleation events

By V. Kerminen, Markku Kulmala. 2002

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88d3e9dd6e9db40d0348d69c3d6391c58be31390

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Markku Kulmala
2. C. Kuang
3. P. Mcmurry
4. V. Kerminen
5. Minghuai Wang
6. A. Mccormick
7. J. Penner
8. Tuukka Petäjä

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. Markku Kulmala
2. C. Kuang
3. P. Mcmurry
4. A. Mccormick
5. J. Penner
6. Minghuai Wang
7. J. Merikanto
8. Tuukka Petäjä

In Water Science and Technology

1. C. Kuang
2. P. Mcmurry
3. J. Penner
4. Minghuai Wang
5. A. Mccormick
6. J. Merikanto
7. J. Smith
8. Markku Kulmala

Citations in the corpus

• The role of relative humidity in continental new particle formation (2011, background): “Also, a number of observations have been made on NPF in the vicinity of clouds [e.g., Hegg et al. ,1 990;Clarke et al. ,1 998; Keil et al., 2001 ], where the RH is very high, usually over 90%.”
• Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation: a synthesis based on existing literature and new results (2012, background): “Kerminen and Kulmala (2002) derived a simple analytical formula by which the scavenging of growing nuclei by coagulation can be taken into account in large-scale models or in analyzing field measurements.”
• A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere (2005, background): “Kerminen and Kulmala [2002] showed that the probability that a critical nucleus formed at rate J(D*p, t) will grow to size Dp before it is scavenged by preexisting particles occurs is:”
• Contribution of particle formation to global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations (2008, methodology): “The formation rate of 3 nm particles is calculated using the expression of Kerminen and Kulmala [2002] , which takes into account loss of 1 nm clusters onto the existing particles during growth.”
• Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations (2018, background): “Based on equation (7), Kerminen and Kulmala (2002) showed that the relation between Jdp1 and Jdp2 can also be written using CS instead of CoagS.”
• Size and time-resolved growth rate measurements of 1 to 5 nm freshly formed atmospheric nuclei (2012, background): “This probability is usually parameterized assuming a constant growth rate as the nucleated particles grow to 3 nm (Weber et al., 1997; Kerminen and Kulmala, 2002; McMurry et al., 2005; Lehtinen et al., 2007).”
• New parameterization of sulfuric acid‐ammonia‐water ternary nucleation rates at tropospheric conditions (2007, methodology): “[37] Finally, we would like to point out that, when incorporating a nucleation parameterization, such as the one developed here, into a large-scale model, the parameterization should be coupled with a new particle formation parameterization (e.g., Kerminen and Kulmala [2002] ; Kerminen et al. [2004”
• Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation (2008, methodology): “The rate of formation of 3nm particles (j3nm) is calculated fromj1nm using the formula from Kerminen and Kulmala (2002).”
• Aerosol size distribution measurements at four Nordic field stations: identification, analysis and trajectory analysis of new particle formation bursts (2007, background): “This is because as the particles grow, a part of the population is lost due to coagulation (see e.g. Kerminen and Kulmala (2002)).”