Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider

By Jutta M. Schneider, S. Gilberg, L. Fromhage, G. Uhl. 2006

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88d2eadccdd980103298f790d44b0f1f495ca1bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. K. L. Barry
2. Jonathan Coddington
3. G. Hormiga
4. M. Kuntner
5. G. Holwell
6. Marie E. Herberstein

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Jonathan Coddington
2. G. Hormiga
3. K. L. Barry
4. M. Kuntner
5. G. Holwell
6. Marie E. Herberstein
7. I. Agnarsson

In Genetics

1. Jonathan Coddington
2. G. Hormiga
3. M. Kuntner
4. K. L. Barry
5. G. Holwell
6. Marie E. Herberstein
7. I. Agnarsson
8. T. Blackledge

Citations in the corpus

• Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity (2008, background): “…the frequency of sexual cannibalism is not affected by female feeding condition (Herberstein et al. 2002; Johnson 2005a; Prokop and Vaclav 2005), reproductive status (Schneider et al. 2000; Schneider and Elgar 2001), or male size (Fromhage et al. 2003; Johnson 2005b; Schneider et al. 2006).”
• Phylogeny of extant nephilid orb‐weaving spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae): testing morphological and ethological homologies (2008, background): “Intersexual conflict is well documented in spiders but mostly in single species, and not in a phylogenetic context (Elgar, 1991; Schneider and Lubin, 1998; Schneider and Elgar, 2001, 2002; Herberstein et al., 2002; Fromhage and Schneider, 2005b; Schneider et al., 2006).”