Growth, public investment and corruption with failing institutions
By David de la Croix, Clara Delavallade. 2006
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88cf0c4f15a984e969a989f1f704945da1a698a4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Amy M. Hageman
- Anna Alon
- Eduardo A. Cavallo
- Tewodaj Mogues
- Christian Daude
- Marcel Fratzscher
- Ilan Noy
- Olivier Bertrand
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION: WHAT HAS PAST DECADE'S EMPIRICAL RESEARCH TAUGHT US? A SURVEY (2018, unknown): “This was supported by a later study that also provided evidence to support the theory that corruption modifies the structure of public expenditure (De la Croix and Delavallade, 2009).”
- The Impact of Corruption on Firm Tax Compliance in Transition Economies: Whom Do You Trust? (2013, background): “While corruption is recognized to be damaging for economic development (Ampratwum, 2008; de la Croix and Delavallade, 2009) and government efficiency (Ahmad and Brookins, 2007), higher levels of generalized trust moderate that relationship by allowing more firms to successfully participate in the…”
- What Determines Public Expenditure Allocations? A Review of Theories, and Implications for Agricultural Public Investment (2012, background): “De la Croix and Delavallade (2009) develop a theoretical model of the channels through which corruption affects the composition of public spending: Sectors in which public outlays are capital-intensive, and therefore offer greater opportunities to solicit and give bribes, such as infrastructure…”
- Public Investment in Developing Countries: A Blessing or a Curse? (2008, background): “De la Croix and Delavallade (2006) make Mauro’s empirical model more consistent with theory, developing a model where the composition of public expenditures is tilted towards physical capital and away from education and health, where the diversion of funds is more difficult.”