Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness
By Gianni Amati, C. J. Van Rijsbergen. 2002
968 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Retrieval & Search, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Hamed Zamani
- W. Bruce Croft
- Allan Hanbury
- Jamie Callan
- Andrew Yates
- Rodrigo Nogueira
- Sean MacAvaney
In Information Systems
- Jimmy J. Lin
- W. Bruce Croft
- Hamed Zamani
- Allan Hanbury
- Hui Fang
- Sean MacAvaney
- Jamie Callan
- Jiafeng Guo
In Information Retrieval & Search
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Andrew Yates
- Hamed Zamani
- Allan Hanbury
- Jamie Callan
- Rodrigo Nogueira
- Sean MacAvaney
- W. Bruce Croft
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
- Chengxiang Zhai
- Hamed Zamani
- Nazli Goharian
- Sean MacAvaney
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Jiafeng Guo
- Qingyao Ai
- Jun Xu
Citations in the corpus
- Relevance-based Word Embedding (2017, methodology): “…estimation (NCE) [12] which hypothesizes that we can achieve a good model by only differentiating the data from noise via a logistic regression model. main concept in NCE is similar to those proposed in the divergence from randomness model [3] and the divergence minimization feedback model [44].”
- Anserini (2018, background): “• PL2 [4] is a representative ranking model from the divergence from randomness framework.”
- Aggregating Continuous Word Embeddings for Information Retrieval (2013, methodology): “…on LSI word embeddings significantly outperforms LSI, it is out-performed by strong IR baselines such as Diver-gence From Randomness (DFR) models (Amati and Rijsbergen, 2002) or Language Models (Ponte and Croft, 1998 These results are not surprising as it has been shown experimentally in many…”
- To Clean or Not to Clean (2018, methodology): “The DFR model 2] contains a detailed discussion about these components).”
- Modeling Diverse Relevance Patterns in Ad-hoc Retrieval (2018, methodology): “Specifically, in the local matching layer, the dimension of the spatial GRU is set to 2 which is tuned in [1, 2, 3, 4].”
- TOPSIG: topology preserving document signatures (2011, methodology): “These are JelineckMercer (LMJM) [22], DLH13 [12], Divergence from Randomness [1], and Bose-Einstein [1].”
- Teaching a New Dog Old Tricks: Resurrecting Multilingual Retrieval Using Zero-Shot Learning (2019, background): “Historically, ad-hoc retrieval systems have been primarily designed, trained, and evaluated on English corpora (e.g., [1, 5, 6, 23] ).”
- Medical Question Answering for Clinical Decision Support (2016, neutral): “5) or Dirichlet ( µ =2 , 000) smoothing [39], respectively; and DFR considered the Divergence from Randomness framework [1] with an inverse expected document frequency model for information content, a Bernoulli-process normalization of information gain, and Zipfian term frequency normalization.”
- Inferring Query Performance Using Pre-retrieval Predictors (2004, methodology): “For example, the optimal setting for the so-called normalisation 2 in Amati & van Rijsbergen’s probabilistic framework is query-dependent [ 3 ].”
- A formal study of information retrieval heuristics (2004, methodology): “Third, we will apply these constraints to many other retrieval models proposed in the literature [1] and different smoothing methods for language models as well [20].”
- Graph-of-word and TW-IDF: new approach to ad hoc IR (2013, methodology): “In particular, we highlight vector space model (TF-IDF [30]), probabilistic (BM25 [25]) and language modeling (Dirichlet prior [33]) approaches and the divergence from randomness framework (PL2 [1]).”
- Diagnostic Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models (2011, methodology): “…space model (pivoted normalization [Singhal et al. 1996a]), the classic probabilistic retrieval model (Okapi [Robertson and Walker 1994]), the language modeling approach (Dirichlet prior [Zhai and Lafferty 2001a]), and the divergence from randomness approach (PL2 [Amati and Rijsbergen 2002]).”
- Statistical Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Critical Review (2008, background): “Authorization does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as that for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.”
- A Markov random field model for term dependencies (2005, neutral): “There is a rich history of statistical models for information retrieval, including the binary independence model (BIM), language modeling [16], inference network model [23], and the divergence from randomness model [1], amongst others [4].”
- Overview of Touché 2022: Argument Retrieval (2022, positive): “Additionally, we provided the collection of 868,655 passages expanded with queries generated using the docT5query model [57].”