Graph algebras: bridging the gap between analysis and algebra

By G. Pino, Mercedes Siles Molina, Francesc Perera Domènech. 2007

46 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Kumjian-Pask algebras of higher-rank graphs (2011, methodology): “The first versions for Leavitt algebras were in [1, 29, 37].”
The socle of a Leavitt path algebra (2007, result): “cribed in [15]. Both theories share many ideas and results, although they are not exactly the same, as was revealed recently in the “Workshop on graph algebras” held in the University of M´alaga (see [8]). Because of this close connection, any advance in one ﬁeld is likely to yield a breakthrough in”
Socle theory for Leavitt path algebras of arbitrary graphs (2008, background): “analytic theories, while sharing some striking similarities, present some remarkable differences, as was shown for instance in the “Workshop on Graph Algebras” held a t the University of Ma´laga (see [11]), and more deeply in the subsequent enlightening work by Tomforde [30]. For a ﬁeld K, the algeb”
Leavitt path algebras: the first decade (2014, background): “A good reference which contains in one place a discussion of both Leavitt path algebra and graph C-algebra properties is [45].”