Linguistic Relativity

By Jürgen Bohnemeyer. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, 2020

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88a7d768617988bf75ab87c830f8ee2f80a29339

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Paula Rubio-Fernández
2. Hanna M. Wallach
3. Damián E. Blasi
4. Adina Williams

In Language and Linguistics

1. Paula Rubio-Fernández
2. Adina Williams

Citations in the corpus

• On the Relationships Between the Grammatical Genders of Inanimate Nouns and Their Co-Occurring Adjectives and Verbs (2020, background): “NeoWhorfian cognitive scientists hold a particularly strong variant of this viewpoint, arguing that that the grammatical genders possessed by inanimate nouns prompt speakers of gendered languages to rely on gender stereotypes when choosing adjectives to describe those nouns (Boroditsky and Schmidt, ”
• Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind (2020, background): “In their review of the linguistic relativity hypothesis, Wolff and Holmes (2011) discuss various ways in which language has been argued to affect thought.”