Study on Mechanical Properties of Natural - Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Composites: A Review
By M. Sanjay, G. Arpitha, B. Yogesha. 2015
407 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Polymers and Plastics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/889c0722d07c490066a3ecaf668dd61d45ca8d45
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanical Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
In Polymers and Plastics
- M. Sanjay
- P. Senthamaraikannan
- B. Yogesha
- S. Saravanakumar
- G. Arpitha
- S. Sinha Ray
- S. Siengchin
- J. Rhim
Citations in the corpus
- A review on synthesis and characterization of commercially available natural fibers: Part II (2019, background): “(Costa and D’Almeida 1999; Sanjay, Arpitha, and Yogesha 2015).”
- Recent progress on natural fiber hybrid composites for advanced applications: A review (2019, background): “Vegetable fibers are subdivided into: leaf, fruit, stem, grass and wood with regard to their sources, as presented in Figure 2 and Table 3 [4, 12, 13].”
- Hybridization Effect of Sisal/Glass/Epoxy/Filler Based Woven Fabric Reinforced Composites (2017, background): “Glass fiber is the most commonly used natural fiber for hybridizing purposes due to its low cost, great availability and easy manufacturing process [6, 7].”
- Studies on hybridization effect of jute/kenaf/E-glass woven fabric epoxy composites for potential applications: Effect of laminate stacking sequences (2018, background): “Fibers in polymer matrix composites (PMCs) can be either synthetic/man-made fibers or natural fibers.”
- Applications of Natural Fibers and Its Composites: An Overview (2016, background): “A hybrid composite is a combination of two or more different types of fiber in which one type of fiber balance the deficiency of another fiber [26].”
- Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibers (2020, neutral): “…(2014) 1.55 - 915.00 23.00 6 Asim et al. (2015) 1.50 2.00–3.80 220.00–938.00 44.00–128.00 7 Pickering, Efendy, and Le (2016) 1.50 - 400.00–938.00 44.00–128.00 8 Sanjay, Arpitha, and Yogesha (2015) 1.50 2.00 500.00 44.00 9 Onuaguluchi and Banthia (2016) 1.50 2.50 560.00 24.50 Range: 1.00–1.55…”