Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X

By R. J. Hanisch, George H. Jacoby. 2001

884 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/887ad080fbf279dd3c096d8722114c98759ce183

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

In Instrumentation

Citations in the corpus

THE PALOMAR/KECK ADAPTIVE OPTICS SURVEY OF YOUNG SOLAR ANALOGS: EVIDENCE FOR A UNIVERSAL COMPANION MASS FUNCTION (2008, background): “As a result, even though certain source detection algorithms have been developed (StarFinder; Diolaiti et al. 2000), or adapted (DAOPHOT II, IDAC; Stetson 1992; Jefferies & Christou 1993), for diffraction-limited image restoration, they did not produce satisfactory results on our images.”
The Westerbork HI survey of spiral and irregular galaxies III. HI observations of early-type disk galaxies (2005, methodology): “All further data reduction was done with GIPSY (Groningen Image Processing System; Vogelaar & Terlouw 2001, http: // www.astro.rug.nl / ∼ gipsy / ).”
Rejecting Astrophysical False Positives from the TrES Transiting Planet Survey: The Example of GSC 03885–00829 (2006, methodology): “We obtained a standard list of stars from this image using profile–fitting (PSF) photometry (DAOPHOT II/ALLSTAR; Stetson 1987, 1992).”
The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2003, background): “…scales is hb=riVlim ¼ (2:0 0:7) ( m=0:27): ð33Þ Because this is a higher luminosity sample than the overall flux-limited sample, one expects a larger bias ( Norberg et al. 2001), but we do not yet detect any significant increase in the bias, since hb/riVlim is consistent with hb/ri at the 1 level.”
WFPC2 Stellar Photometry with HSTphot (2000, methodology): “Stetson (1992) reported systematic errors of up to 0.25 mag over a span of D6 mag in WF/PC data ; my own experiments comparing PSF-Ðtting photometry using unadjusted library PSFs with aperture photometry show deviations of up to 0.15 mag over a similar magnitude range in WFPC2 images, with a…”
Soft X-Ray and Ultraviolet Emission Relations in Optically Selected AGN Samples (2005, methodology): “We derive linear regression parameters in two independent ways, using the ‘‘estimate and maximize’’ (EM) and the Buckley-James regressionmethods from theAstronomy Survival Analysis package (ASURV; Lavalley et al. 1992; Isobe et al. 1985, 1986).”
Chandra and XMM-Newton Observations of a Sample of Low-Redshift FR I and FR II Radio Galaxy Nuclei (2005, methodology): “Analysis with the astronomical survival analysis package (ASURV; Lavalley et al. 1992) implementation of the modified Kendall -algorithm, taking into account the censoring of the X-ray data, shows that the luminosity-luminosity and flux-flux correlations are significant at the 99.8% and 99.95%…”