Carbon forestry and agrarian change: access and land control in a Mexican rainforest

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene (2014, background): “Policies can also be damaging or emancipatory by reshaping the authorities they work through, thus reconfiguring representation and rights (Ribot et al. 2008, Osborne 2011, 875, Poteete and Ribot 2011, Beymer-Farris and Bassett 2012).”
Grabbing “Green”: Markets, Environmental Governance and the Materialization of Natural Capital (2013, background): “Green grabs can encompass appropriation of land and resources for biofuels (McCarthy et al. 2012), carbon (Leach et al. 2012; Osborne 2011) and biogenetics (Neimark 2012a, b); and while in some instances, they entail complete alienation of peasants from the land, in others they involve changes to…”
Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “Several studies reveal that PES – including emerging carbon and REDD+ pilot projects – enhance inequalities in income and access to resources, particularly when pro-poor management measures are not adopted [58 ,72,73], as well as create economic enclosures through territorialization for biodiversity”