Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: a realist perspective
By N. Ronkainen, G. Wiltshire. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2019
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Over the last two decades, the relativist approach has significantly shaped debates about the quality and rigour of qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology (SEP). In the absence of any published critiques of relativism in SEP, this paper problematises its central claims with a focus on the most recent contribution offered by Smith and McGannon (2018. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 101–121). Despite making valuable contributions to the advancement and acceptance of qualitative research, we argue that the relativist approach encounters numerous problems when attempting to reject the “anything goes” problem due to its fundamental ontological commitment to internal, multiple, mind-dependent realities. This paper then makes a constructive contribution to the field by offering an alternative position grounded in a realist understanding of validity. We first suggest that principles such as ontological plausibility, empirical adequacy and practical utility can re-orient both critical thinking and the use of practical techniques which can reduce threats to validity. Second, we suggest that Maxwell’s (1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279–301) descriptive, interpretive and theoretical validity could be welcome concepts for qualitative researchers in SEP. The significance of this realist approach for researchers, reviewers and editors is discussed.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/885a75fb10ddfd05c4d6e89909c65c25430c8ca6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes (2021, background): “…and quality of the analysis can be enhanced through considering Maxwell’s (1992, 2012) types of validity (descriptive, interpretive and theoretical) as well as broader indicators of validity such as empirical adequacy, ontological plausibility and explanatory power (Ronkainen and Wiltshire 2021).”